Not sure why everyone thinks Yuneec will release a updated CGO3+ camera and offer a discount for early adopters. everyone thought when they bought the q500 with Cgo2 they would have an upgrade plan... ya everyone remember that. If anyone thinks Yuneec is going to upgrade the Cgo3+ yes there will be replacing it but with the Cgo5 next year maybe
Don't know about everyone, but I don't 'think' they will offer a discount, but I do 'hope' they will. They certainly should.
I'm not familiar with the earlier models, the YTH is my first Yuneec product, and probably my last. The CGO-3+ has been a real disappointment to many, especially those who expected image quality comparable to the P4. Between bit rate misrepresentation (even though obviously wrong
Deluge,
I agree my terminology was incorrect with "sharper depth of field", the intent was to relate the DJI image provided better focus at distance. Up close, not so much. We don't have much control over depth of field with a fixed aperture lens. I will also agree that my photography jargon is not up to what some of you have.
What's interesting is that you are in a manufacturer specific forum, one referencing a product you do not like or use, appearing to seek what you can to denigrate a manufacturer's product or someone that uses it. It seems DJI zealots/shills/employees/sponsored users, like yourself, are looking high and low for any area they can to use against the H in particular, and Yuneec in general in order to generate doubt and hinder sales of products that compete with DJI.
How about we stick with facts, not innuendo and just plain incorrect statements.
Point 1, this is a manufacturer specific forum but when references and comparisons are made to this or other manufacturer's offerings I will sometimes choose to provide factual information that is relevant and/or to correct factual errors.
Point 2, unlike many posters here and elsewhere who opine on craft they don't own and have never flown, I am an owner and user. If you don't know that then you must not be reading my posts (certainly that's your right).
But where do you get off saying the YTH is a product I don't like or use?
As I have stated here and elsewhere, there are many cool features that the H offers that you can't get for the price anywhere else. It also has some significant flaws and limitations. As do competing RTF camera drones.
And on what basis do you conclude that I seek to hinder sales of the YTH? If I post factual information and my interpretations based on these, and they're not all positive, does that mean I'm seeking to hinder sales? Please, grow up.
Since I am not a shill, employee, or sponsored user, then it is your view that I am a DJI Zealot. Have I got that right? I'd be interested in the criteria one must satisfy to be labeled by you as such, though such a post would be wildly OT. I must say that by whatever criteria you use to justify that view, if applied analogously to yourself, you would certainly qualify as an anti-DJI Zealot. Mostly because of A2 experiences from years ago that you've written about countless times (just talking about the ones I've read). In fact, you probably also satisfy you own criteria to be labeled by you as a Pro-Solo Zealot and a Pro-YTH Zealot as well.
And as for posting based on actual user knowledge, you've posted extensively on YTH, Solo, and the P3 and P4. Tell us, which of those do you own? I believe only the H. Since the Solo went on double fire sale a couple months ago, I have all 4 OT these craft. So I feel quite comfortable commenting on their respective advantages and disadvantages.
If it soothes your ego in some strange way to tell yourself and others that my views are somehow inferior to yours because I'm a DJI Zealot, then by all means, please continue these inaccurate and unwarranted personal attacks. Meanwhile, I will continue to stick to the facts.