Somewhere in the thread you mentioned that flying higher was better in photogrammetry.
At some point does one find photo resolution from a higher altitude diminished to a point that higher is not better.
The reason I'm asking is this afternoon I'm surveying a 300 foot tower site for an engineering company. I typically fly at about 200 feet, but because of the guy wires it would be better for me to fly at say 350 feet but I'm concerned the pictures won't have the necessary detail to give accurate results.Any input?
At some point does one find photo resolution from a higher altitude diminished to a point that higher is not better.
The reason I'm asking is this afternoon I'm surveying a 300 foot tower site for an engineering company. I typically fly at about 200 feet, but because of the guy wires it would be better for me to fly at say 350 feet but I'm concerned the pictures won't have the necessary detail to give accurate results.Any input?