****, there are a hundred posts of members who's camera sucks, but even more, like myself, that has not a single complaint! Except for the cameras software not allowing it to auto brightness adjust and not having a exposure wheel to adjust manually with ease!
Not sure why you ask this. I remember once you wrote that newer Typhoons are getting new camera because of bad lens. I asked EU support about it and was told that there is no problem with camera so they obviously didn't recognized this as issue. Do you have any other news regarding this ?
I rarely use the auto functions but have notice they are improved with the new firmware.
This is the same rat who flew the H backwards into a tree to prove the OA did not work, ugh, you've ruined my evening by hearing his whiney voice again, good luck with your P4, my H is a dream with it's new camera.
I can assure you I'm not trying to start an argument regarding the 2 platforms. I've stayed completely silent and out of this discussion for many weeks even though this was a thread I started. As a reminder, I was there when Yuneec was 100% silent regarding problems with their cameras as a loyal owner of a TH. But ultimately It cost me over a month of agony and wasted time, I think I've earned the right to occasionally comment on related issues. Good luck with your "new camera", my P4 worked the minute I bought it.
Its's not a personal dig, apologies if it came across as that, that Toms TT guy really gets under my skin when he clearly mis-represents the H, and tries to present his findings as an unbiased review. He has a large stake in continuing selling dji by his referral programme and he is far from unbiased, he is simply a dirty salesman liar, and to see hear his filth faking a fair review boils my blood a little....Like you though I may have found myself in a similar situation and I can understand you were going to get what you expected with the P4, I was just lucky and got a great camera back, and now have it on this super flying machine...peace!
So his observations about bit-rates and FOV are incorrect?
Got it. Sorry, I frankly didnt take the time to see if he had a marketing bias. That matters, I agree
yes, along with a lot of other mis-repenseted facts, I started to make a list to post in my original reply but I could not listen to him anymore and stay calm, here is a screen shot from a series of test clips I made in the RAW settings looking a bit rates. I've had a few run at 53-54mbs in Raw too, where I believed it was maxed at 50, apparently not.
