It seems you have so strong passion, but with no basic education and knowledge and thinking about drone Industry and drone technology so far, well, I happen to get some time at the moment and would like to reply with more details to help you understand this industry a little bit more:
1. The Typhoon H prototype tested by one of my friend last week only shows the range around 1Km, outside 1Km the live video was dead totally, and the test was operated in open area, not to mentioned test near buildings.
2. you said that you owned Phantom 3 Advanced previously, yes, P3A do not have vision positioning, but I was talking about the comparison between Typhoon H and Phantom 3 4K, P3 4K has vision&Sonar positioning, while Typhoon H only has Sonar system which is the technology 20 years ago.
3. Why doesn’t DJI release the remote controller with screen? Drones with 1/2.3 sensors are ideal for most consumers, and the key point for them is that it needs to be convenient to edit and share the videos and images captured during flights. Using DJI GO, this is easy. People can use their own phone or other smart device and even save photos to the device, edit them, and share them while in flight. There is never any need to remove the camera’s SD card to copy files onto a computer. Since everyone now owns a smartphone or tablet, why should people have to absorb the cost of a screen when instead they could be supporting more valuable and practical features like computer vision?
4. Is a 360-degree gimbal and retractable landing gear useful for solo pilots? I doubt it. The P3 4K can easily shoot 360 degree angles, because it can be smoothly yawed to capture the images. Independent 360-degree camera movement is generally only useful for professional aerial film making. With that in mind, what professional wants to use a 1/2.3 sensor for professional imaging instead of a larger sensor such as those compatible with the Inspire 1? The P3 4K landing gear also protect the camera during rough landings, reducing the possibility of damage and saving on maintenance.
5. How did Yuneec sell their products out if their technology is so behind? Yuneec uses a lot of professional words to sound impressive to create selling points where there really is none. They are depending on hype to attract people that know nothing about drones to buy their products.
6. Yuneec clearly cheated during their demonstration at CES, making the world think they had created reliable obstacle avoidance. At launch though, the Typhoon H only includes sonar sensors, a technology that has been around for 20 years. They have a 15 degrees detecting angle and just 3-meter detecting distance meaning that they are very impractical for use on an aircraft. They are clearly relying on people to upgrade to RealSense while promising without proof that this will offer the same performance demonstrated at CES.
The company has no credibility or integrity in this business. Real Sense sees changes in light and has an effective range of just three meters, showing that they just can’t create a better avoidance algorithm. Plus, the demo solution at CES, which was used to cheat consumers, is from German company Ascending Tech that was purchased by Intel. That’s why the demos were done in a cloudy day in Germany. They clearly cheated at CES and claimed it was real, and I still don’t know if they actually used Vicon on the day.
7. Yuneec keeps emphasizing the same useless selling points, paying for false product reviews, organizing their teams to respond publicly, and offering an especially high margin to their dealers. All to push products that have been falling behind for more than 2 years when compared to the most advanced products on the market. This is how they do business. We need smart consumers who are able to recognize fact from fiction and research real product details to ensure they buy what they really want.
Above, hoping it could help you a little bit on undertanding of the drone technology and industry, especially what Yuneec is doing in Drone business.