Not sure if "disliking" a P4 is a good reason to go with the H. There are a lot of differences between Yuneec and DJI. Parts for the H are available around the world. Aftermarket batteries are less than half the cost of a P4's. The hex can return and land on 5 motors (or, in my case, 4 motors). The H camera is more difficult to set up for good pics and video, but it's easily removed and the thermal camera is available. I swap cams frequently. The H is darn solid in wind and the video remains stable. Yuneec and DJI service both suck. But once you get a person on the line they generally get it right. Multiple repair locations is beginning to reduce turnaround times. Unlike DJI products, you can open the H box, charge the battery and fly it without the need for an app or any user account or registration. You own it and control it.I know the basics... Yuneec has better customer service, tablet built in, 6 props vs. 4. I need new info. Any Phantom owners out there who dislike it?
Gilly...
I'll add my $.02
I have A P3, and the Typhoon H ( Just sold my Mavic in Jan)
I'll concur about DJI updates and restriction, but size is another factor to consider.
The H is a much large bird that the Phantom series.
Carrying the case with everything is a pain for me if I am going a long distance.
The Phantom in its case seams more manageable to me.
I usually just fly out of the back of my Jeep and leave everything in the back.
I also like the Typhoon Controller with everything self contained.
I can easily hand catch the Phantom, but have not had the nerve to do the same to the Typhoon H.
Range is one other thing to consider, with the Phantoms having more than twice the range.
All in all, I prefer my Typhoon H, but am saving and waiting to see what the Mavic 2 will do.
Agree with that when line of sight is the sky, the H is much more visible. Not so when the background is some shady trees though.For me, one factor is the size of the H. I'm a Line Of Sight pilot so the size and colour of the H against the P4 means that I can fly it further away and still be able to see it. I also have a P2V+ and I've found that I can fly my H two or three hundred feet further out than I can with my P2. Yes, it's a bit more difficult to lug around but not significantly so.
Just to be clear. I also like my P2V+. An ageing aircraft but dead easy to fly. Both aircraft are good, but for different reasons.
That is true of course, but even within the law good visibility is not a given and something that makes it MORE visible can only be a good thing? Unless you are flying covertlyFor those that obey the law, any range beyond about 2500' is pointless for anything smaller than 800mm. If you can't see it while it's being flown you would be in violation of the law. Regardless, buy whatever makes you feel good.
Agree with that when line of sight is the sky, the H is much more visible. Not so when the background is some shady trees though.
I would be amongst the first to buy if that proves to have the image quality we all want. However I assume the cameras will be based on the E90 and hopefully an E50 of the H520 but that seems to have it's own set of problems and going down the same path of errors that they made with the H. I really hope they will have the faults ironed out by then but from experience I somehow doubt it.However (fingers crossed) this all changes later this year when the Typhoon H Plus comes out. At that point, the Phantom will lose its only surviving advantage over the Typhoon in my estimation.
Superior build in what way? What Yuneec product have you taken apart?Can you use third party apps on the H? Like drone deploy, pix4d etc. The downside to having a built in screen is the fact that the tablet powering that screen is nowhere near the power level of whatever phone you are currently using. I am willing to bet that any current cell phone running them DJI app is going to have a more clear picture, and be a more responsive platform altogether. Just a few things to consider. I don't know if you have ever taken apart a DJI drone, but the build quality of a DJI drone is superior to Yuneec. I'll probably get some hate for this, but i would do myself a favor, and wait until the P5 is released in a few weeks and buy a P4 pro on the cheap.
I've taken apart my Q many times, and have helped someone with their H and their P4Pro. You don't even have to take the DJI product apart to see the difference. Pick up an ST10+, and an ST16. Then pick up the DJI controllers. You can feel the difference in durability and quality. You can do the same with the Q, the H, mavic and Phantom. All you have to do is pick it up and look. There is nothing wrong with admitting DJI has better build quality. Yuneec has it's own niche and is good at things DJI doesn't offer.Superior build in what way? What Yuneec product have you taken apart?