EXACTLY. People like tuna, trying to deflect and apologize don't help. The bottom line is that Yuneec isn't delivering on what they promised. But apparently according to a few we are supposed to be okay with that
I suggest you re-read my post above. I've made it clear that the lens issues and encoding are problems that Yuneec must fix. No apologies, and as best an explanation as I can give for what I understand to be the problem. If you think that's "cut and paste", I challenge you to find that text anywhere on the web - it was written off the top of my head. I can do that sort of thing because describing technical specs of software is part of my job.
On the other hand, you posted a whole thread on the CGO3's image quality based on your own misunderstanding of white balance. When it was pointed out that the CGO3 adjusts white balance in raw profile, rather than correcting your accusations, you huffed about it being a strange interpretation of raw. I've got news for you - GoPro behave exactly the same way. The Raw/ProTune *profiles* (not data modes, you know the difference) both adjust the video according to white balance.
Then there was the thread where you posted about the 120fps problems being due to rolling shutter problems with the scaler. When it was pointed out that 120fps uses sampling, not scaling, again instead of accepting you may have got the two mixed up, you helpfully linked to data charts for $30,000 professional cameras.
Then there's the bitrate discussion that will not die. You blamed the white balance on bitrate. Then you blamed the 120fps issues on bitrate. Then you blamed the sharpness on bitrate. You didn't seem to understand how variable bit rates work and nor do you appear to understand how the different codecs and sharpening that GoPro do will make it very hard to compare bitrates between the two systems. It's true that Yuneec's claim of 100Mbps makes it sound as though the CGO3+ is 'twice as good' as a GoPro at 50Mbps - but as a professional you know that's not how these things work.
I'm no apologist for Yuneec. There's a lot of evidence that the Typhoon needed more development and testing, and that compared to DJI they don't have quite as sophisticated software. However, if they are going to fix these things, and if users are going to get the best out of the camera, we all need accurate information and understanding of what's actually wrong. You've blustered and shouted people down, and thrown technical terms around with great enthusiasm, but the information you're providing is in places quite simply wrong and otherwise often misleading.