Anyone know if you bind a 2nd ST16 as I hear you can do now and one loses radio or wifi will the other st16 automatically pick it up? Do they both have full control all the time? A 2nd ST16 if it does take over or they both have full control would also do the trick and just have two operators. One on the rim and one in the canyon bottom.
So its basically like the wizard? So if you bind the camera to the camera app on a phone you no longer pic it up through the st16? you cant bind more then one thing to one side?No. No matter what 2 devices you bind to the H, one can only be camera control and the other drone control.
He turned one of the quads into the relay station. This is epic and all but i dont think any of this is doable with the H. At least not on the ST16. Maybe using another control. Can other controllers be bound to the H?Hello,
Daemon on RCGroups did it, but I guess with a digital link it will not be really simple. Say: is there already available hardware to do it in a reasonable budget?
You probably need another flying device. I was wondering doing something similar for forest mapping with the drone going out of sight, because of the trees.
Ric
I'm not sure if Yuneec uses a proprietary protocol or they just use something already around and maybe open source. I guess only at Yuneec they know.He turned one of the quads into the relay station. This is epic and all but i dont think any of this is doable with the H. At least not on the ST16. Maybe using another control. Can other controllers be bound to the H?
I have never seen so many people publicly announcing their intent to break the law, asking others to be complicit by telling them how to do it. When caught, your fine will be about $21k. If a conspiracy is involved, which means someone agreed to help by providing "how to" information, they get hammered too. That's just the FAA side, the FCC gets a go too. Have fun.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You mean like the SDK for the st16? if it were released and made open source... it would open a whole new world of possibility.I'm not sure if Yuneec uses a proprietary protocol or they just use something already around and maybe open source. I guess only at Yuneec they know.
But the main problem I can see is video link, more thank RC.
What I wanted to do is still analogical on video side and RC was not a problem as the model was controlled through an autopilot. I was thinking to use the TH as relay station.
Probably it was working with a simple video repeater, like those used to send video to FPV goggles, as distance was in tenth or few hundreds meters order, with the TH just over me.
You are joking, isn't it?I have never seen so many people publicly announcing their intent to break the law, asking others to be complicit by telling them how to do it. When caught, your fine will be about $21k. If a conspiracy is involved, which means someone agreed to help by providing "how to" information, they get hammered too. That's just the FAA side, the FCC gets a go too. Have fun.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think you need to read it again. It says you can have spotters and extend the range or rather... in the case of the P4 use the range it comes with out of the box..... Further more again i point out the portal for waivers. Are you not keeping up with Amazon? and their desire to have UAV's delivering packages? Come on... if you think that there is not a loophole your crazy.Better check again on the guy with the 3D printed gun dissemination. No charges but life got miserable. Read the 107 regs again about remote operator's line of sight and not extending range.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk