Yes, obstacles avoidance was on and I can see it avoids some obstacles before the crash without changing any thing. The yuneec SAV analysed the fly logs and the conclusion is that in some conditions (like to much sun for example), obstacles can not be avoided by the system.
Sorry, but I do not think your criticism is valid based on the video.
Hi Tree,Why exactly are we seeing you in the video, and not where the H was flying?
Hi CC Rider,Rayray is very right. Looks like you ran the darn thing into the trees. You attempted something I would never try. Seeing is believing.
Hi CC Rider,
This is your point of view, I personnaly assume that if a product is sold with a very accurate obstacle avoidance system that is supposed to detect trees, it should avoid trees ! So I posted this video to show the limit I encontered with the real sens technology.
Hi Richk,Even if RS is turned on it would be pointing at the direction of travel and you ran under the trees at an angle so that would be the direction it was pointing and RS wouldn't be able to account for branches that angle in from behind it. Had you run straight under the trees it would have turn more and sensed the branches. I've used RS many times and it's worked 100% of the time for me even with very thin branches. You have to know the product and what it can't do to use it successfully
Hi Richk,
I am sorry but I took a lot of time to study this product before to test it in such conditions.
Extract from yuneek FAQ :
How does the RealSense work when it only faces forward?
In Smart Mode, Typhoon H will rotate so the RealSense points in the direction of travel while utilizing the 360° gimbal to automatically keep the camera trained on the subject.
In my case, the RealSense points in the direction of the branches, so it should have avoid it. But may be due to the speed or sun, the obstacles was not correctly avoided.