Can Realsense avoid trees?

[THoff]

Oh yes it does, it "Is" a camera, two actually !

I never said it wasn't a camera, I said the depth sensing doesn't use visible light. If you want to get technical, there are three cameras (sensors actually) on the R200 -- two are IR for depth sensing, one is RGB for color.

 

[DroneClone]

BUT IR is much less susceptible to the visible light portion of the spectrum so it is much less affected in darker lighting.

I guess we will all find out sooner, if not later! Since no one on here has one or flown with one, it's all speculation !

 

[DroneClone]

I never said it wasn't a camera, I said the depth sensing doesn't use visible light. If you want to get technical, there are three cameras (sensors actually) on the R200 -- two are IR for depth sensing, one is RGB for color.

Did I ever say you said it was not a camera? NO ! Get one and fly it, till then what it will and will not do is ALL SPECULATION !

 

[CianMcLiam]

Intel isn't just selling Yuneec the R200 cameras, they invested US$ 60 million in Yuneec and are helping them integrate the technology. Given that Intel created the technology, Yuneec has the backing and support of the people who know it best -- I don't expect a half-a$$ed implementation.

I would normally agree but the teething problems with the H are amateurish for a firm Intel is relying on to showcase their product. As said above, it's all speculation. Intel have to find new avenues to sell chips, and very soon.

 

[THoff]

The teething problems have nothing to do with RealSense though.

 

[CianMcLiam]

But they don't show the Intel influence or investment have resulted in a class leading product. We also don't know the real reason for the constant delays for the Pro H.