Welcome to YuneecPilots.com!

Sign up and join the fastest growing Yuneec drone community.

  1. Boother

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    What is the difference between obstacle avoidance and real sense? What capabilities does real sense give to the drone that it does not already have with just the factory obstacle avoidance?
     
  2. RinZ

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    the Netherlands
    watch the video on Yuneec.com
     
  3. CAPTAINDRONE

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    841
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    The Obstacle Avoidance on the Typhoon is Sonar based. It will sense objects that are about an inch wide directly in front and stop without hitting them.

    Realsense has a wide forward view. You just fly the Typhoon forward and it maps out the space in front of it and marks each object with GPS Coordinates. It stores the last 30 seconds worth of what it sees so that the pilot can move in any direction and not hit an object. The pilot does not have to avoid the object, the realsense will tell the Typhoon to go up, down, around the object. All the objects are placed in memory so that the pilot can then fly backwards, sideways, forward through a course. Realsense is kind of like a guide that lets you walk through a mine field and not get blown up. Watch the demos on YouTube from this past week.
     
  4. Boother

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks, captain. So if I understand what you're saying, with just the obstacle avoidance the drone just basically stops and hovers, waiting for pilot input while real sense actually allows the drone to choose the best path and maneuver itself around the obstacle?
     
  5. Peter a

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2016
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    39
    Yes , but is there only me who thinks that what was 30 seconds ago behind you may have moved.
     
  6. Boother

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2016
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Right, Peter. I don't think I would count on real sense when I'm not going forward.
     
  7. CAPTAINDRONE

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    841
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Correct!
     
  8. CAPTAINDRONE

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    841
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Hmmmm..... good point. But I can't think of anything that you'd fly your drone through that is moving other than blowing tree branches. Flying through animals, people, cars would be kind of asking for trouble.
     
  9. CAPTAINDRONE

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    841
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Yeah, I think I'd spin the drone around instead of backing out.
     
  10. Peter a

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2016
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    39
    That's what they said it first , if you needed to fly backwards, it would keep the camera pointing at the subject, but rotate the craft and use realsense again.
    So always using realsense in the direction of flight.
     
  11. Cogito

    Joined:
    May 13, 2016
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    33
    Do you think Real Sense really uses GPS coordinates? Didn't they do the demo at CES on an indoor stage?
     
  12. CAPTAINDRONE

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    841
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Because it maps the land in front and records it, GPS must come into play.

    As for the indoor show, well that was a bit fantasy with the 'H' covered in visibility sensors. But I guess that was what was required for an indoor demo.
     
  13. Cogito

    Joined:
    May 13, 2016
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    33
    That's too bad, The reason I was waiting for Real Sense was for indoor stage use, it already works well outdoors.