My first thought......why am I hearing the plans of the FAA from a drone manufacturing rep? Sounds a bit more like influence peddling taking place.
I think the reason Brendon was interviewed is because he is very active on social media with groups on legal news on facebook. Sure he has his companies interest but he does do a good job at protecting us small guys. Lets face it if we go down in flames so will a lot of UAV companies that cater to the hobbyist so we need companies like DJI to lobby for us and I guess them. It all comes hand in hand.
Not my words, just another article I had read about this.
"
Some in the industry feel that the ARC may be swayed to adopt technologies developed by one of the ARC members. However, the 74 member group represents a very broad base of stakeholders. Members range from major drone manufacturers of all types like
Northrup Grumman,
DJI,
Insitu, and
PrecisionHawk to drone platforms including
AirMap and
Skyward. The list also includes a long list of large corporate enterprises – both drone-related businesses and drone customers; advocacy groups like
AUVSI and the
Commercial Drone Alliance, research institutions, and government and law enforcement agencies. With so many members, the ARC may have difficulty reaching a conclusion, but they will certainly hear multiple sides of the issue.
The ARC is significant, having the potential to affect every drone operator and manufacturer. Decisions made by this group could influence regulation that defines how much information is gathered about drone operators themselves, their clients and their operations. More positively, it could help move drone integration – and commercial applications – forward. “Eventually the recommendations it produces could help pave the way for drone flights over people and beyond visual line of sight,” says the FAA."
Things are going to change, lets just hope for the better.
