The JPEG is over-sharpened but nonetheless looks a lot better than the (surely faulty) H Plus in-camera JPEG.
At 5.7MB, the EVO 12 megapixel JPEG can't be directly compared to oliver's previously uploaded 15.0MB 20 megapixel H Plus JPEG but I compared them anyway. I see more colour and less noise in the EVO image and significantly fewer sharpening artifacts. Compare the ugly white halos in the two 800% zooms below where the dark landscape meets the light sky. It concerns me that Yuneec haven't fixed their obvious JPEG algorithm blunder yet.
View attachment 11450
It also appears that Autel have graded their sharpening algorithm so that the artifacts are less noticeable in the foreground, resulting in a much more usable image.
I also compared the poster frame from your EVO 4k/60 video with that of oliver's H Plus YUN_0003.MP4 4k/60 video. Both are compressed with the H.264 codec but for me, the sharpening halo is more pronounced in the H Plus image below:
View attachment 11451
The halo around the foreground balcony post in the H Plus screen grab above may be an extreme example but for my money, EVO also grades the foreground to distance sharpening algorithm in its video too, making them easier and more natural to look at. The (MP4 screen grab at 800%) example below shows EVO's sharpening halo applied at different levels to the foreground foliage and the distant tree:
View attachment 11453
That said, many people won't see the MP4 halos from either camera at 100% view unless they have a very sharp eye and are looking for them.
As things stand, for me, the EVO output beats the H Plus in some key departments, while costing less; and, for some reason, its 4k/60 video plays a lot more smoothly on Youtube. If I didn't need the more pro-oriented toolset of the H Plus, its truly standalone controller, its bigger still images and its superior in-camera colours - and its official UK availability - it would be a no-brainer!