Link to FAA announcement
After reading the document, I believe it is the backlog of approving FRIA’s that was placed on the shoulders of the FAA.Ent
More info--they're saying it's the FAA's fault for not approving more remote IDs![]()
Thanks Steve. I hope all is well with you!Link to FAA announcement
After reading the document, I believe it is the backlog of approving FRIA’s that was placed on the shoulders of the FAA.
There are several modules approved, but price and availability are well outside of what was expected when the Sep 16 deadline was set.
It also states that the delay in enforcement is discretionary until 16 Mar 2024. This allows for enforcement to be administered on a case by case basis. So if you are doing something really stupid they can still whack you for not being RID compliant.
Steve. 6 months or not, RID is a bad concept and will never stop the drones not manufactured with RID modules inside. from being flown by many. Eventually of course all the older drones will be in the drone graveyard. Two things: first, most commercial and public service folks will simply buy new drones. Last, to include local law enforcement in policing RID will be a nightmare...Link to FAA announcement
RID was originally proposed by DJI. They pushed the FAA to adopt it. I believe their plan was to be the only authorized seller so all other manufacturers would have to pay them for rights to use it.A big winner in this is DJI, already touting their new drones with RID.