Hello Fellow Yuneec Pilot!
Join our free Yuneec community and remove this annoying banner!
Sign up

ST24 instead of ST16

Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
198
Reaction score
124
Hy

Can we use the ST24 instead of the ST16 as a main controller?
I ask because on the ST24 we have many more possibilities to use the channel settings
according to pictures I found online.
On the ST24 we can use the Trim Switches as well to program different channels etc.

Andy
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Messages
113
Reaction score
31
Yep, ST24 will work with the H

Sent from my XT1096 using Tapatalk
 
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
198
Reaction score
124
so has someone tested this?

Andy
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
1,299
Age
49
Location
UK
For owners who have upgraded the H920 to the 920+, the ST-24 is replaced by the ST-16. My understanding is that Yuneec are not continuing software support for the ST-24, and the ST-16 'platform' is going to be shared by all 'pro-sumer' and commercial drones in future.

Running an ST-24 would loose a lot of the functionality built into the FlightMode app, including Cable Cam and so on. On the whole, I'm not sure how much value there is in channel settings when the Typhoon is pretty well set up on a properly working ST-16.

The only exception is some users have reported poor turning or acceleration - which very often seems to be caused by a 'sticky' control giving bad values, rather than configuration of the channels.

What specific changes do you want to make?
 
Joined
Apr 27, 2016
Messages
719
Reaction score
272
Age
57
For owners who have upgraded the H920 to the 920+, the ST-24 is replaced by the ST-16. My understanding is that Yuneec are not continuing software support for the ST-24, and the ST-16 'platform' is going to be shared by all 'pro-sumer' and commercial drones in future.

Running an ST-24 would loose a lot of the functionality built into the FlightMode app, including Cable Cam and so on. On the whole, I'm not sure how much value there is in channel settings when the Typhoon is pretty well set up on a properly working ST-16.

The only exception is some users have reported poor turning or acceleration - which very often seems to be caused by a 'sticky' control giving bad values, rather than configuration of the channels.

What specific changes do you want to make?
After using Solex on my Solo's (now there's OpenSolo woo hoo), I'd be more than happy to pay for such features on the H. I'd even buy another one. As it is now, Yuneec needs to open up and allow some creativeness and more options so that people like......you......can get compensated for taking the H to the next level. Don't get me wrong. I really like my H a lot, but wouldn't be wild if Arducopter could be ported to the H with custom scripts for the gimbal etc? Game over for ***.

For pro flyers or expert hobbyist flyers Yuneec would be wise to let it all hang out and allow infinite parameter control, then issue a notice that tampering with parameters outside the norm will void the warranty should a crash ensue. I have no problem with that.

After 1 year and 2 months the H is still my favorite camera machine simple because of the gimbal and improved video quality (IMO). I'll buy the H520 if it has more bells and whistles and operator control over the H; that would include a robust mission planner with more control of parameters to customize flight characteristics and such.

Doesn't the ST24 also have a better monitor?
 

New Threads

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
16,981
Messages
198,264
Members
19,650
Latest member
Find Email