rdonson
Premium Pilot
Big Mac delivered back today, praise be, and I can see slight moiré in the shale towards top right (shimmering pixels/aliasing). It may be due to auto settings; or even compression since H.264 is lossy. And it's possible that the sensor can't cope with the gravelly detail up there in 4k/60, in which case filming at lower res might cure it. I don't see any elsewhere in the shale but the area top right is where most of the texture variation/detail is.I don't see it either. The only thing I notice is that the exposure seems to change slightly as if it were set on AUTO.
Hi Ron, I'm viewing in QuickTime Player at actual size, ie not full screen.YuKay, how are you viewing the video on the Mac?
OK, OK. If I look very critically at the area you highlighted, I do see more pixel activity there than elsewhere in the image (near middle of clip). Do you find that distracting? I sure don't. It could be that the rock size in that area of the quarry more closely matched the pixel size at that resolution and distance. Let's wait and see if that is actually a camera fault or a quirk.Hi Ron, I'm viewing in QuickTime Player at actual size, ie not full screen.
Thanks Rubik. I was just reporting what I see (as a novice photographer/videographer but an experienced designer/editor). I do find it distracting but I don't know what to expect from the camera. FWIW, I see slight moiré on the right hand side of the shale mountain throughout the clip, while the H+ is flying towards it and at the end when the camera is panning - and I suspect that the detailed texture there pushes the 1" sensor to the max at 4k/60.OK, OK. If I look very critically at the area you highlighted, I do see more pixel activity there than elsewhere in the image (near middle of clip). Do you find that distracting? I sure don't. It could be that the rock size in that area of the quarry more closely matched the pixel size at that resolution and distance. Let's wait and see if that is actually a camera fault or a quirk.
Thanks Rubik. I was just reporting what I see (as a novice photographer/videographer but an experienced designer/editor). I do find it distracting but I don't know what to expect from the camera. FWIW, I see slight moiré on the right hand side of the shale mountain throughout the clip, while the H+ is flying towards it and at the end when the camera is panning - and I suspect that the detailed texture there pushes the 1" sensor to the max at 4k/60.
If you experts tell me that's to be expected from a relatively inexpensive 1" sensor, fair enough. I'm older and wiser, never having viewed any raw 4k/60 footage from any other camera. But for me, the point of downloading raw camera footage was to compare it to the processed YouTube rendition of the same footage and I discovered that not all the artifacts are created by YouTube.
H Plus colour settings compared in video and stills:
That was an excellent comparison of the various settings currently available on the TH+. Thanks for posting.Glad my videos are making it to the forum, if there is anything specific you’d like me to try just message me.
That was an excellent comparison of the various settings currently available on the TH+. Thanks for posting.
Could you make some of the .jpg and .dng files available for us to tinker with (DropBox, etc.)?
Yep. You can do the same in post with the same resulting slightly cropped image. The question is: how much of the sensor is being used for the .dng image? Is the output still 20 mega pixels?Did I understand @Peggy correctly that Yuneec cropped the JPEG to straighten the horizon but not the DNG???
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.