OK Thanks!Not unless it interferes with the gear or camera rotation.
If not then you are fine.
I did not know that. Thanks!If you are referring to the plastic tube as a bracket, don’t worry about it except as mentioned. That tube is not an actual antenna, just an item in place to hide the antenna wire inside of it. The plastic tubes were a cosmetic item added to the airframe that caused people to think they were obtaining “improved” 2.4 antennas. Truth was, and is, the actual antennas never changed from the original parts used.
That's right, these are the same wires that use to hide inside the shell of earlier H models. Bringing them out and extending them downward does improve the antenna performance somewhat, but as @PatR pointed out there is no improvement in the antennas themselves. The tubes are indeed cosmetic, I've seen people fly with just the wires hanging out.The plastic tubes were a cosmetic item added to the airframe that caused people to think they were obtaining “improved” 2.4 antennas. Truth was, and is, the actual antennas never changed from the original parts used.
The wires “hanging out” is how the original H standard was released
LOL! Indeed! And I even know where the alleged pooch screwing occurred, I have the evidence recorded from the test flight on the SD card it came with.Sounds like someone screwed the pooch when they did the refurb.
When you replaced the retract module did you re-install the landing leg the correct way round??
Might make a difference!
I've heard rumors about shady service from the SoCal facility, I'm guessing they might be true!![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.