Welcome to YuneecPilots.com!

Sign up and join the fastest growing Yuneec drone community.

  1. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Yuneec, you paying attention!! You had better pick up the pace in regards to camera options. This is similar to what a lot of us are looking for. PLEASE!!!!!!!!
     

    Attached Files:

  2. TopFlightTexas

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2016
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    24
    Yaaasssss

    Yuneec, give us something we can use! Spend the extra $ on quality check assurance for the CGO3+! 50/50 chance of unfocused or focused is pure bull crap for a $1,299.99 retail item.
     
    Forrestt likes this.
  3. Goh

    Goh

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    36
    Ye
    yes, Yuneec at least you come out a better camera and ensure the camera quality for those who want to upgrade to replace the CGO3+
     
    Forrestt likes this.
  4. JohnL

    Joined:
    May 2, 2016
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    227
    Location:
    Gratallops, Spain
    Holy mackerel you DO realize this camera is NOT for the P4, right?? Please compare apples with apples!
     
    Laura Turbeville and abinder like this.
  5. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    LOL I wasn't comparing anything, just hoping for a similar camera in the future for the Typhoon H. ;)
     
    TopFlightTexas likes this.
  6. Brandon Lowe

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2016
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    148
    Location:
    Eagle ID
    That camera is $900 on its own. How many are going to pay $900 for a camera upgrade on a $1300 multirotor?
     
    abinder, Eric, Rayray and 1 other person like this.
  7. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Yeah, their camera is but who's to say Yuneec cant come up with a similar ver. at less cost. Hey, I was just putting it out there.
     
  8. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    And we all know Dji is super proud of their stuff ($$$). ;)
     
  9. TopFlightTexas

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2016
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    24
    It is so sad to see the CGO3+ as a "might be, maybe . . ." focused stock camera. I understand you can spend $300 on filters and a new lens. Although by then, if you did purchase a second CGO3+ for the mods, you're pushing that $900 "outrageous" price range for quality imaging . . .
     
    Forrestt likes this.
  10. WilsonFlyer

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2016
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    106
    I, for one, think the H aligns more with the Inspire from a CRAFT standpoint. To me, that makes it apples to apples. I think too many people compare the H to the Phantom by using price point as the standard as opposed to the aircraft itself. From a DESIGN standpoint, the H is a magnitude beyond the Phantom, which is essentially a souped-up 350QX which many of us were flying 5 years ago. Same old. Same old, except the camera and software.

    Just telling it like it is. FWIW and BTW, I own all of them, including a P3 and a P4.
     
  11. Burntpixel

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    Georgia
    That camera also has digital zoom after a certain point where the optical zoom capability ends. That is pretty useless.
     
  12. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    To a degree I agree with you in respect to photography however, other uses such as certain types of inspection, law enforcement work it would be very useful.
     
  13. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    No one camera is going to suit everyone's needs, that is really the bottom line at least IMO.
     
    abinder likes this.
  14. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    I totally agree Wilsonflyer. The Typhoon H as a craft deserves higher end options for it's payloads.
     
    0ldsc00ld0g and WilsonFlyer like this.
  15. OnTheRopes

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2016
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    152
    Location:
    Peak District, UK
    I would if it got the right results, the price of the craft is irrelevant for me it is just a tool to get a camera where I want it and a very good tool at that.
     
  16. Burntpixel

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    Georgia
    Law enforcement could work. Inspection? Depends on how critical the image is in order to see precisely what is being inspected.
     
    Forrestt likes this.
  17. TopFlightTexas

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2016
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    24
    Very true, yet ALL cameras should function correctly and be fine tune inspected as well as held to a certain standard of quality imaging from the factory. Otherwise your product is inferior to the competitors'.
     
    deluge2 and Forrestt like this.
  18. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Keyword "options". Doesn't mean you HAVE to buy it just that it is available and I think with time we shall see it happen.
     
  19. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    I was thinking along the lines of live inspection without the need to save images but yeah, it would depend for sure.
     
    Burntpixel likes this.
  20. Forrestt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Precisely.
     
    TopFlightTexas likes this.