You're most welcome.
You would find it interesting the number of times people have given me verbal permission to use them or their property in a shoot that avoided/refused to sign a photographer's release when they were presented with one. I had one R.E. broker that got more than a little upset because they did sign a release. The broker requested the imagery before it was paid for to initiate a listing for a $1.2 mil property. When delivery was refused until payment was made things hit the fan with demands for the imagery since the property owner "owned" it, paid for or not. The building and property release, containing a "for consideration" and retention of copyright clauses signed before the shoot knocked that demand in the dirt. No, I never got paid for the shoot but at the same time nobody got to make money from my work without paying for the work. A failure on my part for that one was in not obtaining a written contract to perform the work. One of those "verbal agreement" things... The devil is in the details and there's a lot of stuff to look out for.