Oh I'm sure the bureaucrats and Big Drone have our (the average Joe 6 pack) best interest at heart.........NOT!Thanks for the info. I’m not ranting or outraged. If I drop my drone on my roof that’s my problem obviously. I was just trying to point out how private sector as usual is ahead of government clarification. I know of events here done 100% legally only to have the local PD shut them down because they weren’t in the loop. There seems to be a lot of energy being put into prohibiting not helping and the whole confusion created by Hobby class aircraft being used commercially is still murky. Why would anyone bother to jump through all the hoops when the agencies still aren’t in unison? If I fly my 480 within established FAA guidelines with permission on private property for fun and personal use, then I’m still supposed to get a 107? If that’s the case then no camera drone should be sold without an FAA number and all the transfers of ownership and registration needed. As it stands now, my FAA number is joke due to the lawsuit that clarified we are not aircraft. So which is it? And I’m not ranting. My purpose is to openly discuss the murky side. I’m seriously considering a 520 and setting up as a commercial service as the city of Tucson is accepting drones as a viable tool. Of course I’m going to do it right. I’m not stealing work from any legit companies as it’s still a learning curve for me. I don’t charge anyone. All my flying this summer in the very restrictive state of CA was edited into a music video for my artist. Again, it’s for my enjoyment but I gave hours of footage to a good editor and now I’ve got a kick *** video that I contributed to. Did I break the law by doing this?
If the events were done 100% legally, then the municipality should be sued.