- Joined
- Dec 5, 2016
- Messages
- 131
- Reaction score
- 51
Hello!
have you heard about problems with metadata accuracy with the E90? The Pix4D report says that there is a relatively big difference between given camera parameters and the parameters calculated from the images themselves.
This results in weird stuff, like unnaturally concave terrain models, or overall lower precision, despite using GCPs. What hurts me the most is that a P4P gets nice, repeatable maps with better geo-accuracy .
It seems that the slower the H520 goes, the smaller the inaccuracies are. Best results are with the stop for every photo setting but this is a major pain as it takes much longer and still the results are not as good as a P4P (which took photos in continuous flight).
Any ideas how to fix this?
have you heard about problems with metadata accuracy with the E90? The Pix4D report says that there is a relatively big difference between given camera parameters and the parameters calculated from the images themselves.
This results in weird stuff, like unnaturally concave terrain models, or overall lower precision, despite using GCPs. What hurts me the most is that a P4P gets nice, repeatable maps with better geo-accuracy .
It seems that the slower the H520 goes, the smaller the inaccuracies are. Best results are with the stop for every photo setting but this is a major pain as it takes much longer and still the results are not as good as a P4P (which took photos in continuous flight).
Any ideas how to fix this?