At the present time third party software such as Iris will work with DJI but not Yuneec products, if I understand it correctly. Hopefully third party software will work with Yunnec in the future.Hate to nit pick. Is the tick on the wrong side for "3rd Party Software"?
It's a FAA buddy system, they don't want you to fly out of vlos and be responsible that you can! I am sure overseas and down under the rules are about the same.Why didn't Yuneec offer more range with better antennas to begin with? Why should I need to change antennas?
If you are comparing the Inspire with X3 camera on price alone, Inspire loses. The H appears that it will fill a niche with good value. However for commercial purposes H will lose on the important things such as the H top speed of 22mph (but 40 in follow me) when inspire does over 45mph with GPS mode (P mode). The capabilities of the Inspire in software are much more refined too, but what really sets things apart is the 2-3 mile range of the Inspire, using Lightbridge communications. The distance sets you free.
However, for professional photographers the new Inspire Pro offers a micro 4/3 camera which is in a league of its own. It's no comparison to the H Camera, regardless of price.
I look forward to reviews soon.
Go back to your DJI forums and sell your ****! I fly both!, but I don't troll on forums of the others and bash them!Enough said
Go back to your DJI forums and sell your ****!
Good! Just listening to the mosquitoes that flew over here to suck blood! How bout you!hey DC hows it going?
Out of interest, what tech do the fpv drone racer's use? They have near instant video transmission.They do not have Lightbridge technology for one, but I am sure they could come up with their own version, or just build the controller with range booster built in ! I think they may not want to invest in this since it is against FAA and others flight regulations, good question !![]()
If you are comparing the Inspire with X3 camera on price alone, Inspire loses. The H appears that it will fill a niche with good value. However for commercial purposes H will lose on the important things such as the H top speed of 22mph (but 40 in follow me) when inspire does over 45mph with GPS mode (P mode). The capabilities of the Inspire in software are much more refined too, but what really sets things apart is the 2-3 mile range of the Inspire, using Lightbridge communications. The distance sets you free.
However, for professional photographers the new Inspire Pro offers a micro 4/3 camera which is in a league of its own. It's no comparison to the H Camera, regardless of price.
I look forward to reviews soon.
sold my p3 pro and now my p3 standard is up for sale.. going 100% yuneec. tired of dji bs!
If I was you I will prefer Phantom 3 4k rather than Typhoon H, because: 1. P3 4K has longer flying distance up to 1.2Km, while Typhoon H only 1Km. 2. P3 4K has visual & sonar positioning system, while Typhoon H only has Sonar avoidance system and this is really unstable comparing to P3 4K positioning system. 3. you can use your own iphone or ipad for live stream screen which will bring much better FPV experience, which Typhoon H only has keyboard-like remote controller that is very reflective during FPV, we can hardly see the video. 4. P3 4K has really well-design drone body with very good quality making materials, while Typhoon H has really cheap design. 5. the P3 series has been released more than 1 year already, the control system is very stable and reliable, while Typhoon H only has prototype so far on the market, not to mention the stability of control system. 6. P3 4K is much cost-effective with retail price 799 USD, while Typhoon H cost 1299 USD (without realsense). 7. Typhoon H has outdate technology with fake adverstiement on CES 2016...and now asking for 1299 USD...I don't see any reason for you to choose Typhoon H.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.