Wait for the day you are trying out for a paying job, being given several different types of drones to demonstrate your skills on a breezy day, and provided only a front passenger seat floor mat from a BMW to use as a landing pad. You’ll work hard for that spot regardless of what you’re flying. Bad enough doing it nose out but it gets tough when the entire approach has to be flown nose in, in Atti mode...
Not to take away from anything said before this post but good landings come from experience and understanding. In fixed wing they come from good coordination of power, descent rate, speed, and coordinated control input, doing them over and over and over in different conditions until you understand without thinking what has to be done to get it right.
In multirotors we have the same repetition with practice while needing to understand the aerodynamic forces associated with rotor downwash and side loading from wind effects. Control inputs must be subtle but given before drift or problems occur, not after. We can’t be “chasing” the aircraft, but be anticipating what it is going to do and correct before it does it.
Multirotors with downwards optical sensors are a lot easier as they “fix” the aircraft on a ground position. However, the operator is performing less of the landing act than the flight controller as the FC maintains lateral position instead of the operator.
The Typhoon H is not hard to land, it just requires the operator has the understanding and skills necessary to command and control the aircraft. The H requires a pilot, while others don’t need anybody to land them as they can do it without you. One requires skills and intelligence while others are set up so any moron can land them. In which group do you want to be?[emoji848][emoji6]