PatR
Premium Pilot
And apparently in my case, b30 as well.
From all I’ve seen, yours appears to be a singularity. However, I’ve only used Win XP and Win-10 for upgrades so I don’t know if Win-7 works or not.
And apparently in my case, b30 as well.
The camera FOV angle varies with the pixel count.I am new here and was recently given a Typhoon H as a gift and part of its use was to be able take pictures of our property, I cannot get the properties in the picture with a limit of 400 ft. I have been researching fixes, with mixed results, I tried downloading the GUI and it won't allow me to do so on my old Windows 7. Am I just stuck with 400' limit? I have even tried to chat online with Yuneec and they always seem busy, I did not want to hijack this thread, but it came up in the forum search. Thank you for any input, and no hurry.
Actually, I don't think you are correct there. As I read it, the altitude limit is 400' above ground level. If you go to the CAA website, there is a diagram that shows this. The problem though is, after a certain firmware update, all H's are limited to around 400' and this is measured from your take off point. So it would be impossible to follow the terrain and fly up a mountain side and up and over the top of that mountain to an altitude of 400' above it because Yuneec set the limit from the take off point.Just to clarify for U.K. readers of PatRs text above. In the U.K. it is now law that both recreational and commercial flyers of drones must not exceed 400' height above AGL. Previous to a couple of months ago, a recreational flyer didn't have such a restriction over them...it was only advisory... but now it's compulsory. For the commercial flyer, there is the possibility of flying above 400' but only if he has been given a special PfCO to allow it under very restricted instances...and is very hard to obtain. A Standard PfCO holder is limited to 400' no matter what and no matter how near the holder is to a structure. The 400' rule in the U.K. is NOT terrain following: It is 400' above the ground that the pilot is standing on...not the nearby hill.
I agree. Last week I was updating my Ops Manual and in the course of researching for it I noticed that too. The legal height limit now appears to be terrain following whereas previously the height limit was above the ground level that the pilot was stood on.Actually, I don't think you are correct there. As I read it, the altitude limit is 400' above ground level. If you go to the CAA website, there is a diagram that shows this. The problem though is, after a certain firmware update, all H's are limited to around 400' and this is measured from your take off point. So it would be impossible to follow the terrain and fly up a mountain side and up and over the top of that mountain to an altitude of 400' above it because Yuneec set the limit from the take off point.
Well, mine will and I'm betting your's will as well?! And this throws up something that makes the this terrain following 400' rule so ridiculous. You could now fly from the bottom of a valley up the side of hill/mountain and fly to 400' above the top of that said hill/mountain. But if you hiked up to the top of that mountain and took off from the top, you could fly up to 400' above your take off point but as soon as you fly over the edge of the hill/mountain, you'll be breaking the law! You'd have to actually decrease your altitude to stay 400' AGL!Good news for those that would benefit from this relaxation of the rules but not so good for H owners that have been limited to 400'.
And previously exactly the opposite was the case. This new clarification brings us into line with the situation in the U.S. except that we don't benefit from being able to count buildings in to the equation.Well, mine will and I'm betting your's will as well?! And this throws up something that makes the this terrain following 400' rule so ridiculous. You could now fly from the bottom of a valley up the side of hill/mountain and fly to 400' above the top of that said hill/mountain. But if you hiked up to the top of that mountain and took off from the top, you could fly up to 400' above your take off point but as soon as you fly over the edge of the hill/mountain, you'll be breaking the law! You'd have to actually decrease your altitude to stay 400' AGL!
Indeed. How we are legally expected to inspect a tower or building that is over 400' in height, I just don't know.And previously exactly the opposite was the case. This new clarification brings us into line with the situation in the U.S. except that we don't benefit from being able to count buildings in to the equation.
I am aware that I can alter the max height of my TH but I'm not inclined to do so. I'll leave it as is. My Phantom's height limit is set higher so on the occasions that I need the extra height I'll use that. As it is now, I rarely fly up to 400' anyway: My best photography and video comes from flying at heights well below 400'.
You could apply to the CAA for a permission if outside a restriction zone. Could take a while thoughIndeed. How we are legally expected to inspect a tower or building that is over 400' in height, I just don't know.
Yes you could. But you shouldn't have to. This is where I'm getting back to the point that the CAA should be making it easier...... And one of the reasons, I just can't be bothered with it anymore.You could apply to the CAA for a permission if outside a restriction zone. Could take a while though![]()
Fortunately that isn't a problem here in the U.K. We have very strict firearms regulations.An option might be to move to the U.S., where people try to shoot them out of the sky...
Fortunately that isn't a problem here in the U.K. We have very strict firearms regulations.
Shouldn't be starting fires under your arms, especially if there hairy!☢ WARNING DANGEROUS SIDETRACK AHEAD!☢
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.