Hi Tuna, by the way you are talking it is obvious you are aware of the P4P new camera and the magnificent features that comes with at an equal prices as our H.
There's a few things worth repeating: Firstly, the H was developed nearly a full year before the P4P, so it shouldn't be surprising if the cameras are different. The two drones are targeting rather different users - the H is a general purpose platform with redundancy and a choice of cameras. The P4P is designed purely as a 'camera drone'. As such you get different packages with strengths and weaknesses - and very different prices by the time you have a properly 'ready to fly' system. If one specific feature matters to you more than any other, then buy the drone that matters to you. If price matters, then compare equivalent systems. Just picking out one feature and pretending everything else is equal is disingenuous.
We also have no idea what Yuneec are going to release over the next year, so those of us who already have a Typhoon H - which has outstanding flying characteristics - may be able to upgrade our existing machines for much less than the cost of ditching our current drones and buying a P4P (which is not upgradeable, remember?).
Finally, when it comes to camera quality I think we have to be careful here. As usual, all of the publicity photos come from experienced photographers, often in unique locations and choosing subjects that really suit the camera. There's a good chance that just like the Mavik, a lot of people are going to expect photos 'like the professionals' and be disappointed that the results they get are not as good. There have been plenty of back to back tests of the current generation of cameras and enough competitions to demonstrate that they're a good match for each other, but without some effort and skill, the photos you get out of any of these cameras can be distinctly average.