PatR
Premium Pilot
Before the H first came out it was advertised to be a retractable gear hex with a 360* gimbal, 4k camera. There was also advertisement of an upcoming thermal camera and a claim of 20+ minute flight times. With the exception of flight times the advertising was pretty accurate while the performance features were expanded over time afterwards.
In any case, there was not much talk about other cameras for the H until the 520 was starting to be discussed. The 520 and it’s E-90 camera was supposed to be Yuneec’s 1” sensor, 20mpx solution for the enterprise market, along with the 12mpx E-50 “close up” inspection camera. It was at that time people started clamoring for the E-90 to be retrofit to the H-480. Despite Yuneec releasing a statement such would happen, it never came to pass.
With the above in mind, I don’t recall Yuneec ever advertising a wider camera selection for the H-480 than it was originally released with. Some people wanted and hoped for more but they had the option of buying other platforms that could do what they desired without having to wait in hope their desires might eventually be fulfilled.
Buying old technology with the hopes it will be updated to match new and evolving technology over time is a risky move and the odds are not in our favor.
IMHO, those that were “bamboozled” with camera advertising were those that bought the 520 and H Plus. It took almost 6 months from model release for the E-50 camera to start showing up. The Plus with the C-23 was supposed to have a straight shooting, 20mpx camera but lens distortion was so bad Yuneec had to develop a software crop to hide the distortion. I stopped paying attention to the H Plus shortly after it was found wanting so I don’t know if Yuneec ever bothered to set up a longer focal length camera for it. With both the 520 and H Plus the owners wound up mission restricted through factory design. Yet there are still some that will buy using hopes and wishes as decision factors.
In any case, there was not much talk about other cameras for the H until the 520 was starting to be discussed. The 520 and it’s E-90 camera was supposed to be Yuneec’s 1” sensor, 20mpx solution for the enterprise market, along with the 12mpx E-50 “close up” inspection camera. It was at that time people started clamoring for the E-90 to be retrofit to the H-480. Despite Yuneec releasing a statement such would happen, it never came to pass.
With the above in mind, I don’t recall Yuneec ever advertising a wider camera selection for the H-480 than it was originally released with. Some people wanted and hoped for more but they had the option of buying other platforms that could do what they desired without having to wait in hope their desires might eventually be fulfilled.
Buying old technology with the hopes it will be updated to match new and evolving technology over time is a risky move and the odds are not in our favor.
IMHO, those that were “bamboozled” with camera advertising were those that bought the 520 and H Plus. It took almost 6 months from model release for the E-50 camera to start showing up. The Plus with the C-23 was supposed to have a straight shooting, 20mpx camera but lens distortion was so bad Yuneec had to develop a software crop to hide the distortion. I stopped paying attention to the H Plus shortly after it was found wanting so I don’t know if Yuneec ever bothered to set up a longer focal length camera for it. With both the 520 and H Plus the owners wound up mission restricted through factory design. Yet there are still some that will buy using hopes and wishes as decision factors.
Last edited: