- Joined
- Apr 10, 2016
- Messages
- 592
- Reaction score
- 173
- Age
- 61
I agree they should have provided the product with what they claimed to be the specs but I also believe that people could have waited to see before they rushed to buy. Developing a product often results in instructions and other things being published before the product is finished (not an excuse but the reality of development) what I'm addressing is when I've read people think they are owed new controllers etc. just because Yuneec decided to change antenna design etc. This reminds me of GoPro's 4 blk whereby many features were touted which never came to fruition....like exposure control and locked exposure. I don't know of any other industry where Caveat emptor should be more applied....I learned the hard way by purchasing Align Multirotor products a couple years ago and lost thousands of dollars on completely worthless gimbals and hexes and the dealers also lost a tremendous amount of money and customer goodwill. That's the current "wild west" of drone development...so people should just be cautious and less anxious...I'm satisfied I got my $1299 out of the product because it's paid for itself many times over in just a couple months. I've come to learn unfortunately that in this industry because of the way I use the equipment I always have to buy the product because both manufacturers and reviewers are often looking out for their own interests just as consumers are. I can't see what it truly does until I own one and then I set about trying to improve it, changing lenses is a good example.[/QUOTEyour Did your complaining and displeasure with that company along with others get a positive overall result in the companies future busines practices?