DerStig,
Give it a rest. I watched the video simultaneously on a 4k 15" laptop screen and a 40" 1080 screen and it looked pretty damned good. It's probably not healthy always looking at everything through a microscope or soda straw.
Video looks good to me even playing back full screen frame by frame I don't see any ghosting of the roof or over sharpening.
Since you're the world's singular authority on what looks good I guess not, but that's why people stopped giving much credence to your ramblings.
and there I was thinking it was this DerStigFolks, kindly take it easy on my fiend, uh, friend, Der Stig. Not to be redundant, but you know he is an expert in the video field. You need to pay attention to his helpful comments, after all, he's a Hollywood mongrel, mogul I mean. Help me, Google spell.
Folks, kindly take it easy on my fiend, uh, friend, Der Stig. Not to be redundant, but you know he is an expert in the video field. You need to pay attention to his helpful comments, after all, he's a Hollywood mongrel, mogul I mean. Help me, Google spell.
and there I was thinking it was this DerStig View attachment 2378
I do know what ove sharpening looks like. As mentioned before, i watched the video on two screens, both in full screen, and don't see your problem. I'm not selling anything, I don't have a commercial license.
The problem here is that you make it a point to tear anything H down, and pick people apart in every post. When everyone else likes the look of the video except you, the problem is you, not the video.
Do you know what over sharpening looks like? I'm guessing no.
As a matter of fact I do know what over sharpening does, but I think most people on this forum don't expect perfection to the level your very critical eyes see things.
You can't expect that sort of perfection you are referring to from this level of equipment, we're not talking about broadcast quality drones or cameras here, Yuneec offerings just cant be judged that way at such low prices, these are basically for hobby use and should be judged as such.
Whilst with the right settings and expertise the Typhoon H is more than capable of earning its keep, but it still can't be judge for professional broadcast quality acquisition.
That's nice, who, what, where, when, how? Credits please.
Thanks for the links. I can always appreciate useful information from an expert without portfolio.
The CGO3+ is easily bested by a GoPro, so no it's not capable of earning it's keep
Are sorry I did not know it was a competition of which is the best camera, I do also own a gopro hero 3 black and hero 4 which both exhibit some degree of sharpening just saying !
Over 100 movies and TV series, multiple emmys, yeah I don't have a portfolio (its actually called a reel and resume)
Steven Spielberg is a noob compared to you LOL
No, but has publically said that he wants to do what I do. He's a fine collaborator
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.