Typhoon H Plus

[oliver]

@Rubik
thank you
all my cameras go through this same test plan for many years, whether drone or ground.
Of course, the CG03 + has passed, the C23 is much better in photo and better dynamics in video, especially in low light

 

[Eagle's Eye Video]

@Rubik
thank you
all my cameras go through this same test plan for many years, whether drone or ground.
Of course, the CG03 + has passed, the C23 is much better in photo and better dynamics in video, especially in low light

So the ARW files are ones you created in Lightroom, correct?

With my older version of Photoshop, I have had to convert both the DNG and ARW files to uncompressed TIFs to view them... not surprisingly the DNGs show the most detail and retain much smoother tones across the board...

 

[oliver]

So the ARW files are ones you created in Lightroom, correct?

With my older version of Photoshop, I have had to convert both the DNG and ARW files to uncompressed TIFs to view them... not surprisingly the DNGs show the most detail and retain much smoother tones across the board...

All the files are originals that come from the C23, there is no editing, otherwise, how to compare?

 

[Eagle's Eye Video]

All the files are originals that come from the C23, there is no editing, otherwise, how to compare?

Agreed! So the C23 saves ARW, DNG and JPG formats? Did you see the noticeable amount of both spherical and chromatic aberration in _DSC2224.ARW vs YUN_0007.DNG? Wonder what that is about... was there a difference in saved settings? I'm looking on the left side at the metal railing.

 

[oliver]

Agreed! So the C23 saves ARW, DNG and JPG formats? Did you see the noticeable amount of both spherical and chromatic aberration in _DSC2224.ARW vs YUN_0007.DNG? Wonder what that is about... was there a difference in saved settings? I'm looking on the left side at the metal railing.

No, the sony record in ARW and the C23 in DNG. To be able to apreciate, one needs a software which knows how to treat ARW or DNG

 

[Eagle's Eye Video]

thanks for the clarification!

 

[Rubik]

Agreed! So the C23 saves ARW, DNG and JPG formats? Did you see the noticeable amount of both spherical and chromatic aberration in _DSC2224.ARW vs YUN_0007.DNG? Wonder what that is about... was there a difference in saved settings? I'm looking on the left side at the metal railing.

If you look at the corresponding .jpg files, you can see the camera settings in File Properties/Details. The RX100 file was shot at f/5.6, ISO-125, 1/200 sec. the C23 file was shot at f/2.8, ISO-146, 1/1923 sec. Quite different. However, the aberration was more likely lens errors in the zoom lens of the RX100. The advantage of a fixed focal length lens system is apparent here.

 

[Ty Pilot]

@Eagle's Eye Video depending on which version of Photoshop you have, you'll probably need to download Adobe's DNG converter to be able to open that file in Photoshop - it's free, here is a link to get it DNG Converter

 

[Rubik]

Also, Cyberlink PhotoDirector handles the raw files nicely.

 

[oliver]

@Rubik exactly!
Here are the 2 ARW and DNG files opened with Photoshop and saved in JPG without any editing

https://we.tl/2a1He0TlTQ

 

[Eagle's Eye Video]

@Eagle's Eye Video depending on which version of Photoshop you have, you'll probably need to download Adobe's DNG converter to be able to open that file in Photoshop - it's free, here is a link to get it DNG Converter

Right now using Pixillion to convert DNGs to uncompressed TIFs... which my version of Photoshop (CS2) will open.

 

[rdonson]

No problem loading and viewing all in Adobe Lightroom Classic CC..... here's a screen shot to show that the meta data includes GPS coordinates for the photo

View media item 805

 

[Rubik]

@Rubik exactly!
Here are the 2 ARW and DNG files opened with Photoshop and saved in JPG without any editing

https://we.tl/2a1He0TlTQ

Photoshop must be fixing the fish-eye distortion and chromatic aberration automatically, then. Those errors are clearly visible in PhotoDirector before editing. Is there any way to view the raw files exactly as shot?

 

[rdonson]

If you're using Adobe Camera RAW you can choose to not perform lens corrections and chromatic aberration. Meta data for those corrections generally exist in the files themselves and Adobe looks for them.

The same applies to Adobe Lightroom which uses the same RAW converter.

 

[rdonson]

Here's an example of Adobe Lightroom applying lens corrections

View media item 806

 

[Rubik]

Here's an example of Adobe Lightroom applying lens corrections

View media item 806

Very cool! PhotoDirector also lets you apply lens corrections . A Sony 24-70mm f2.8 lens correction file closely matches the RX100 but the results are not as satisfying as you are showing from Lightroom.

 

[Ty Pilot]

Here is a video that has just been posted by a Plus owner - it is in Spanish I think, but there is a lot of footage from the camera, it looks amazing.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Rubik]

I particularly like the shot of the horses:

Too bad this isn't 4k.

 

[rdonson]

Its not 4K but the color rendition is truly excellent if this is straight out of the camera.

 

[Ty Pilot]

Yeah it's starting to appear that Yuneec has the C23 hitting on all cylinders. Lets hope the aircraft and controller are up to the same.