Those camera specs tell me little about the camera. Most of those specs could be implemented on the C23.
- does it have a glass lens?
- what is the dynamic range?
- what ND filter threads are required?
- is it the same Sony 1” sensor as the C23? Mavic Pro 2?
At least from the photo of the camera in their PDF, it looks to have a proprietary slide-in filter slot on the side. Can't comment on your other points.
There are several points still keeping me from pulling the trigger on the H+...
1) It's been months since the last FW update... I believe the reason customer issues/suggestions are being ignored, is to potentially moving us along the to the next platform as opposed to actually improving the performance of the current platform.
Example: Pilots have complained about the camera file setup on the H+... only both JPG/DNG capture, with no option for one or the other. There have been those who have bemoaned the lengthy delay in using time-lapse. All H+ pilots have complained just as much about the absolute shite quality of the JPGs.
Soooooo... instead of fixing all of the above issues with a FW upgrade, they announce a new platform that seems to address all these complaints... separate JPG and DNG capture, claimed usability of hyperlapse in JPG mode... and if they did
not address the JPG quality issues, that hyperlapse feature is as moot as Real Sense.
2) There is some difficulty in obtaining certain parts... on the current platform, the H+. As pilots on this forum, we hear how important it is to properly take care of our barreries... and it is recommended to use a 3rd party charger.
Sooooooo... anyone tried to order a H+ battery adapter cable for those recommended 3rd party chargers, recently? You can find dozens of retailers that have the adapter cables for the newly discontinued H, but none for the current platform H+. ? Unlike the H, there has never been a separately available gimbal mount kit designated for the H+.
Given the above, what's a pilot waiting on the sidelines supposed to think?